Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
Date: 2024-12-20 02:30:31
Message-ID: Z2TWx8vMAxczff0I@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:27:04AM -0800, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 6:26 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> v2 does not have these weaknesses by design.
>
> I agree that v2 is better than v3 in terms of that.

Okay. In terms of the backbranches, would you prefer that I handle
this patch myself as I have done the HEAD part? This would need a
second, closer, review but I could do that at the beginning of next
week.

Or perhaps you'd prefer doing it yourself? That's up to you, happy to
help as always :D
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2024-12-20 02:34:45 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-20 02:19:29 Re: [PATCH] Fixed creation of empty .log files during log rotation