Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests
Date: 2024-12-20 01:28:30
Message-ID: Z2TIPuN_RUKZqtb7@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 05:02:19PM -0800, Jacob Champion wrote:
> I've taken another shot at this over on the OAuth thread [1], for
> those who are still interested; see v40-0002. It's more code than my
> previous attempt, but I think it does a clearer job of separating the
> two concerns.
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi+=FzVg+C-pQHCwjW0qU-POHmzZaD2z3CdsACj==14H8kQ@mail.gmail.com

Ah, thanks for the poke on this one. I'm wondering if v40-0002 and
v40-0001 should be in reverse order, but that's a discussion to keep
on the other thread, of course.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Pang 2024-12-20 01:45:12 Re: Back-patch of: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-12-20 01:07:49 Re: pure parsers and reentrant scanners