Re: per backend I/O statistics

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per backend I/O statistics
Date: 2024-12-17 09:13:44
Message-ID: Z2FAyFSg-lRGFZio@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 08:13:59AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Having said that, v9-0002 looks good to me (except the pgstat_fetch_proc_stat_io
> renaming).

This routine returns a PgStat_Backend from a pgstats entry of type
PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND, so the name in v9-0001 would not be true once
more types of stats data are attached to this structure. The name in
v9-0002 is more consistent long-term.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-12-17 09:14:15 Re: DOCS: pg_createsubscriber wrong link?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-12-17 08:47:57 Re: DOCS: pg_createsubscriber wrong link?