| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, adam(at)labkey(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails |
| Date: | 2024-12-11 20:59:15 |
| Message-ID: | Z1n9I4MBers-si82@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:03:55PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 8:38 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Maybe we can try an "hybrid" approach that could simplify the AlterSystemCatalogEncoding()
>> by relying on a new struct, say:
>
> Interesting idea, yeah, I'll look into that.
>
>> Do you think it's worth to move the discussion into a dedicated hackers thread?
>> (maybe reaching a wider audience?) I think the subject is sensible enough.
>
> Ok yeah, I'll start a new thread on -hackers soon.
If we are leaning towards a more comprehensive fix in v18, ISTM we should
go ahead and revert commit 562bee0 (both for master and v17). Or am I
misinterpreting the proposed path forward here?
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-12-11 21:12:46 | Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-12-11 20:37:08 | Re: TimestampTz->Text->TimestampTz casting fails with DateStyle 'Postgres' |