From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) |
Date: | 2024-12-09 23:35:21 |
Message-ID: | Z1d-uR20pt6wtQIS@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 12:46:35PM -0800, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> True. There seems another place where we possibly leak memory on
> CacheMemoryContext when using pgoutput via SQL APIs:
>
> /* Map must live as long as the session does. */
> oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CacheMemoryContext);
>
> entry->attrmap = build_attrmap_by_name_if_req(indesc, outdesc, false);
>
> MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldctx);
> RelationClose(ancestor);
>
> entry->attrmap is pfree'd only when validating the RelationSyncEntry
> so remains even after logical decoding API calls.
Right. I'm also slightly worried about how we handle streamed_txns in
set_schema_sent_in_streamed_txn() through CacheMemoryContext. It
feels like this could be made more robust without relying on an
explicit list_free() in get_rel_sync_entry(), including the fact that
some cleanup also relies on pgoutput_stream_abort() being taken.
As a whole, thinking long-term, it seems to me that we'd live better
if we remove all direct dependencies to CacheMemoryContext in this
code.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2024-12-09 23:39:03 | Outdated comment on scram_build_secret |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-12-09 23:26:20 | Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) |