From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) |
Date: | 2024-12-09 07:43:30 |
Message-ID: | Z1afotXXP90qfhVL@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 08:23:00AM +0000, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions. They make sense to me.
>
> Please see the updated version as attached.
It sounds to me that we are in agreement for HEAD, so I've moved ahead
and fixed this issue on HEAD using your patch that adds a dedicated
memory context in PGOutputData as that's the cleanest way to address
things in a single execution context of pgoutput.
For stable branches, let's see.. I need to reply to the latest
message.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-12-09 07:50:20 | Re: Pass ParseState as down to utility functions. |
Previous Message | Michael Harris | 2024-12-09 07:34:22 | FileFallocate misbehaving on XFS |