| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block |
| Date: | 2024-11-27 00:42:14 |
| Message-ID: | Z0Zq5pkhMHWPZZ6w@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:24:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Tweaks of the tests across multiple stable branches happen all the
> time, and adding one specific to 17~ is no big issue. I'm in the
> middle of it but I'm lacking the steam to do so today. Will likely
> finish tomorrow.
I've edited the whole, added this extra test based on \syncpipeline in
17~, kept the remaining tests in 14~ where pgbench is able to handle
them, and backpatched that down to 13. Let's see now what we can do
with the psql bits.
Anthonin, now that the original problem is solved, could you create a
new thread with your new proposal for psql? That would attract a
better audience for reviews.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-11-27 01:38:20 | Re: Count and log pages set all-frozen by vacuum |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-11-26 23:11:15 | Re: UUID v7 |