Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes
Date: 2025-03-27 15:19:55
Message-ID: Z-Vsmz0qGkywaS71@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Sadeq Dousti
> Thanks Greg and others for the feedback!
>
> Please find attached the patch for implementing \dN (including \dNt, \dNi,
> \dNit).

I don't care particularly about the choice of letter, but I think this
is the wrong way round. It should be \dtN instead of \dNt.

Is the form \dN actually useful? For partitioned tables, you'd only
get the empty root indexes. If you actually wanted that, there's still
\dtiN.

Christoph

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2025-03-27 15:30:35 Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-03-27 15:19:16 libpq maligning postgres stability