| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |
| Date: | 2025-03-27 01:53:57 |
| Message-ID: | Z-SvtVg0D1hLssii@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 02:09:32PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 12:10 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm not going
> > to insist on shipping this if I'm the ONLY one who would ever get any
> > use out of it, but I doubt that's the case.
>
> Hearing no other votes against this, I have committed it, but now I
> wonder if that is going to break the buildfarm, because I just noticed
> that the changes I made in v9 seem not to have resolved the problem
> with debug_parallel_query, for reasons I do not yet understand.
> Investigating...
There's at least one buildfarm member complaining with the tests of
pg_overexplain, not for the reason you are mentioning here:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2025-03-26%2020%3A33%3A20
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2025-03-27 01:54:52 | support ALTER TABLE DROP EXPRESSION for virtual generated column |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-27 01:53:20 | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |