| From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl race conditions |
| Date: | 2025-04-01 15:15:52 |
| Message-ID: | Z+wDKLY7+5NxBjZO@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 04:55:06PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 2:02 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > But if we "really" want to produce a "new" WAL record, what about using
> > LogLogicalMessage()?
> >
>
> We are using injection points for testing purposes, which means the
> caller is aware of skipping the running_xacts record during the test
> run. So, there doesn't seem to be any reason to do anything extra.
Agree, the idea was to provide extra debugging info for the tests. We can just
keep it in mind should we have a need for.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nico Williams | 2025-04-01 15:29:31 | Re: AIO writes vs hint bits vs checksums |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-04-01 15:15:34 | Re: [PATCH] Fix build on MINGW on ARM64 |