From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl race conditions |
Date: | 2025-04-02 11:14:52 |
Message-ID: | Z+0cLIB3B8s59sBn@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 03:04:07PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I have changed it based on your suggestions and made a few other
> changes in the comments. Please see attached.
Thanks!
> *
> + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("log-running-xacts"))
>
> It is better to name the injection point as skip-log-running-xacts as
> that will be appropriate based on its usage.
Agree.
+# Note that the injection_point avoids seeing a xl_running_xacts that could
and
+# Injection_point avoids seeing an xl_running_xacts even here. This is required
s/an xl_running_xacts/a xl_running_xacts/? in the second one? Also I'm not sure
"even here" is needed.
Apart from the above that LGTM.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2025-04-02 11:16:30 | Re: pg_restore documentation and --create/--single-transaction limitation |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-04-02 10:39:34 | Re: Fix 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl race conditions |