Re: Incorrect resource manager data checksum in record with zfs and compression

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: John Bolliger <johnbolliger(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Incorrect resource manager data checksum in record with zfs and compression
Date: 2022-10-04 00:54:57
Message-ID: YzuEYY0N4sNeHRSQ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:41:23PM -0700, John Bolliger wrote:
> Our architecture is similar but all of the servers are now on ZFS now and
> Postgres 13.8 with Ubuntu 18.04+ and still doing streaming replication, all
> with ECC memory and 26-64 cores with 192gb ram+ on top of a ZPOOL made out
> of NVMe PCIe SSDs.
>
> A101 (primary) -> A201 (replica) -> B101(primary) -> B201 (replica).

replica -> primary does not really make sense for physical
replication. Or do you mean that B101 is itself a standby doing
streaming from A201?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Bolliger 2022-10-04 01:01:38 Re: Incorrect resource manager data checksum in record with zfs and compression
Previous Message Ryan Booz 2022-10-03 20:26:28 PGSQL Phriday #001 - Two truths and a lie about PostgreSQL