From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support pg_attribute_aligned and noreturn in MSVC |
Date: | 2022-09-20 00:21:28 |
Message-ID: | YykHiEBq3DmRajUt@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 06:21:58PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> It turns out that MSVC supports both noreturn [2] [3] and alignment
> [4] [5] attributes, so this patch adds support for those. MSVC also
> supports a form of packing, but the implementation as I can tell
> requires wrapping the entire struct (with a push/pop declaration set)
> [6], which doesn't seem to match the style of macros we're using for
> packing in other compilers, so I opted not to implement that
> attribute.
Interesting. Thanks for the investigation.
+/*
+ * MSVC supports aligned and noreturn
+ * Packing is also possible but only by wrapping the entire struct definition
+ * which doesn't fit into our current macro declarations.
+ */
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
+#define pg_attribute_aligned(a) __declspec(align(a))
+#define pg_attribute_noreturn() __declspec(noreturn)
#else
Nit: I think that the comment should be in the elif block for Visual.
pg_attribute_aligned() could be used in generic-msvc.h's
pg_atomic_uint64 as it uses now align.
Shouldn't HAVE_PG_ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN be set for the MSVC case as well?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Coleman | 2022-09-20 00:51:37 | Re: Support pg_attribute_aligned and noreturn in MSVC |
Previous Message | Michel Pelletier | 2022-09-20 00:15:54 | Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format |