Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Date: 2022-08-27 05:35:25
Message-ID: YwmtHRRoA5gQi7lZ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 06:26:37AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> If I'm not wrong, there's some lingering comments which could be removed since
> 495ed0ef2.

It seems to me that you are right. I have not thought about looking
at references to NT. Good catches!

> src/bin/pg_ctl/pg_ctl.c: * on NT4. That way, we don't break on NT4.
> src/bin/pg_ctl/pg_ctl.c: * On NT4, or any other system not containing the required functions, will
> src/bin/pg_ctl/pg_ctl.c: * NT4 doesn't have CreateRestrictedToken, so just call ordinary
> src/port/dirmod.c: * Win32 (NT4 and newer).
> src/backend/port/win32/socket.c: /* No error, zero bytes (win2000+) or error+WSAEWOULDBLOCK (<=nt4) */

There is also a reference to Nt4 in win32.c, for a comment that is
irrelevant now, so it can be IMO removed.

There may be a point in enforcing CreateProcess() if
CreateRestrictedToken() cannot be loaded, but that would be a security
issue if Windows goes crazy as we should always expect the function,
so this had better return an error.

So, what do you think about the attached?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
win32-more-cleanup.patch text/x-diff 3.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-08-27 05:53:24 Re: windows cfbot failing: my_perl
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-08-27 04:20:29 Re: windows cfbot failing: my_perl