From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tracking last scan time |
Date: | 2022-08-30 18:46:23 |
Message-ID: | Yw5a/xZk/OXC/c+l@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 02:05:36PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 01:44, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't have a particular opinion about the patch, I'm just pointing
> out that there are other ways. Even just writing down the numbers on a
> post-it note and coming back in a month to see if they've changed is
> enough to tell if the table or index has been used.
>
>
> There are usually other ways to perform monitoring tasks, but there is
> something to be said for the convenience of having functionality built in and
> not having to rely on tools, scripts, or post-it notes :-)
Should we consider using something cheaper like time() so we don't need
a GUC to enable this?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-30 18:46:32 | Re: Postmaster self-deadlock due to PLT linkage resolution |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2022-08-30 18:36:17 | Re: Hash index build performance tweak from sorting |