Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Date: 2022-08-16 11:44:52
Message-ID: YvuDNNO/CfHMYPMk@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Daniel Gustafsson
> In general that's a good idea, but they are so trivial that I don't really see
> much point in doing that in this particular case.

Plus the variable they set is called differently...

Christoph

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-08-16 11:44:55 Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-08-16 11:43:31 Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM