Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level
Date: 2022-07-19 03:16:15
Message-ID: YtYh/2+vvwpvyOmE@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:39:55PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:27 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> +0.90
>
> Consider changing:
>
> "makes any base backups taken before this unusable"
>
> to:
>
> "makes existing base backups unusable"
>
> As I try to justify this, though, it isn't quite true, maybe:
>
> "makes point-in-time recovery, using existing base backups, unable to replay
> future WAL."

I went with simpler wording.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson

Attachment Content-Type Size
wal.diff text/x-diff 2.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-07-19 03:22:44 Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-07-19 03:04:12 Re: doc: New cumulative stats subsystem obsoletes comment in maintenance.sgml