Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Date: 2022-07-15 03:44:16
Message-ID: YtDikC1Ov/jM0Nzc@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 03:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Please note that patch authors should not switch a patch as RfC by
> themselves. This is something that a reviewer should do.

This patch has been marked as waiting for a review, however the CF bot
is completely red:
http://commitfest.cputube.org/simon-riggs.html

Could you take care of those issues first?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-07-15 04:19:10 Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-15 03:41:03 Re: Collect ObjectAddress for ATTACH DETACH PARTITION to use in event trigger