Re: Collect ObjectAddress for ATTACH DETACH PARTITION to use in event trigger

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Collect ObjectAddress for ATTACH DETACH PARTITION to use in event trigger
Date: 2022-07-25 09:05:35
Message-ID: Yt5c3/ItzF9fXiq5@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 08:42:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> What I intended to say is similar to what you have done in the patch
> but in a new function. OTOH, your point that it is okay to change
> function signature/name in the test module seems reasonable to me.

Thanks. Let's do with the function change then. As introduced
orginally in b488c58, it returns an array that gets just unnested
once, so I'd like to think that it had better be a SRF from the
start but things are what they are.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-25 09:10:33 Re: Add last failed connection error message to pg_stat_wal_receiver
Previous Message Michael J. Baars 2022-07-25 09:02:26 Password reset link / 'less' does not exit in psql version 13.4