| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | troy(at)frericks(dot)us, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to reference the type of lock in the documentation. |
| Date: | 2022-07-08 01:20:55 |
| Message-ID: | YseGd7IEIK3i7Fw3@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 08:45:11PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/explicit-locking.html
> Description:
>
> On page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/explicit-locking.html, I'd like
> to suggest a search-engine-optimization improvement. Generally, but
> especially on this page, it'd be nice to have the lock name along with the
> user-friendly name. For example, with the first use of "SHARE UPDATE
> EXCLUSIVE", I'd like to see the lock name with it, for example, "SHARE
> UPDATE EXCLUSIVE (ShareUpdateExclusiveLock)".
I see your point --- that the names that appear in the pg_locks view
don't appear in our documentation. The attached patches adds the
pg_locks names after each lock name. You can see the doc output here:
https://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/explicit-locking.html
If people like this, I can apply it to all supported branches.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| lock.diff | text/x-diff | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-07-08 02:12:59 | Re: How to reference the type of lock in the documentation. |
| Previous Message | Noboru Saito | 2022-07-07 01:38:05 | Re: proposal: convert comments in documents to html comments |