Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Date: 2022-07-07 00:11:57
Message-ID: YsYkzVnFpV79ZTXU@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 05:13:27PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-07-06 We 16:46, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> The build farm also has frogmouth and currawong, 32 bit systems
>> running Windows XP, but they are only testing REL_10_STABLE so I
>> assume Andrew will decommission them in November.
>
> Yeah, it's not capable of supporting anything newer, so it will finally
> go to sleep this year.

Okay, thanks for confirming. I think that I'll give it a try today
then, my schedule would fit nicely with the buildfarm monitoring.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-07-07 00:23:01 Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-07 00:09:35 Re: Backup command and functions can cause assertion failure and segmentation fault