From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ |
Date: | 2022-06-16 06:14:16 |
Message-ID: | YqrKOPvi/JtS5gzR@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 02:47:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 04:55:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> I think we can drop mention of Itanium (RIP): the ancient versions of
>> Windows that could run on that arch are desupported with your patch.
>> It might be more relevant to say that we can't yet run on ARM, and
>> Windows 11 is untested by us, but let's fix those problems instead of
>> documenting them :-)
>
> Okay to remove the Itanium part for me.
install-windows.sgml has one extra spot mentioning Windows 7 and
Server 2008 that can be simplified on top of that.
>> There are more mentions of older Windows releases near the compiler
>> stuff but perhaps your MSVC version vacuuming work will take care of
>> those.
>
> Yes, I have a few changes like the one in main.c for _M_AMD64. Are
> you referring to something else?
Actually, this can go with the bump of MIN_WINNT as it uses one of the
IsWindows*OrGreater() macros as a runtime check. And there are two
more places in pg_ctl.c that can be similarly cleaned up.
It is possible that I have missed some spots, of course.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Bump-WIN_MINNT-to-0x0A00-everywhere-Windows-10.patch | text/x-diff | 7.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2022-06-16 06:23:09 | Re: Modest proposal to extend TableAM API for controlling cluster commands |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2022-06-16 06:13:07 | Re: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber |