From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17504: psql --single-transaction -vON_ERROR_STOP=1 still commits after client-side error |
Date: | 2022-06-02 05:39:41 |
Message-ID: | YphNHbOkg22H7d52@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:39:27AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The code looks like just a thinko that "COMMIT" works fine even if the
> given commands have ended in failure. But actually it doesn't for
> client-side failure.
>
> diff --git a/src/bin/psql/startup.c b/src/bin/psql/startup.c
> index ddff903915..2261f78f81 100644
> --- a/src/bin/psql/startup.c
> +++ b/src/bin/psql/startup.c
> @@ -426,7 +426,9 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> if (options.single_txn)
> {
> - if ((res = PSQLexec("COMMIT")) == NULL)
> + res = PSQLexec(successResult == EXIT_SUCCESS ?
> + "COMMIT" : "ROLLBACK");
> + if (res == NULL)
> {
> if (pset.on_error_stop)
> {
Yeah, it seems a bit strange to commit the changes if an error happens
on the client side, and the docs are a bit blurry about that because
it has never been considered, I guess. This would not happen with a
failure in the backend as COMMIT would just map to a ROLLBACK
automatically.
The change that you are sending would enforce this policy as Christoph
would like. Some tests would be nice to check such behaviors, say in
001_basic.pl, but we also need to be careful when sending down queries
with psql expected to fail because of SIGPIPE (c757a3d, 6d41dd0). The
docs need a refresh, they mention now that COMMIT is sent after the
last command but that would not be the case anymore with this patch if
there is a client-side error.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-06-02 09:51:17 | Re: How is this possible "publication does not exist" |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2022-06-02 02:51:26 | Re: BUG #17449: Disk space not released |