From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Петър Славов <pet(dot)slavov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
Date: | 2022-05-31 12:03:17 |
Message-ID: | YpYEBdG59FJ8s0FI@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder if it's possible to use an index ON tab (pg_sleep(100ms))
> or something like that (perhaps even use an expresion involving an
> advisory lock acquisition, which is being held by the other session), to
> widen the window.
I have not considered the use of expressions to enforce a lock at this
stage. I'll give it a shot, even if it comes to the abuse of an
immutable function with volatile internals :)
> The stop events patch that A. Korotkov posted [0] would likely be very
> useful here.
>
> [0] https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdtSEOHX8dSk9Qp+Z++i4BGQoffKip6JDWngEA+g7Z-XmQ@mail.gmail.com
Thanks for the reference. I've wanted to resurrect this stuff,
actually, after dealing with 6dced63 to be able to have a stop point
in the middle of a restart point.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Jensen | 2022-05-31 12:44:08 | Re: Inconsistent time zone output for JSON at UTC |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-05-31 12:00:34 | Re: Inconsistent time zone output for JSON at UTC |