From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes |
Date: | 2022-05-12 02:46:27 |
Message-ID: | Ynx1AzF+YN4FOv6q@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:40:17AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> Looking at the release notes from the point of view of someone who has maybe
> not been following the long-running debate on removing exclusive backups:
>
> "Important-sounding backup thing is suddenly gone! What was that
> again? Hmm, can't
> find anything in the now-current Pg 15 docs [*], do I need to worry
> about this!?"
>
> [*] the backup section has removed all mention of the word "exclusive"
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-LOWLEVEL-BASE-BACKUP
>
> versus:
>
> "Long-deprecated thing is finally gone, ah OK whatever".
>
> I am thinking back here to a point in my working life where the
> release notes were reviewed
> (by a team including non-Pg specialists) for potential issues when
> considering a major
> upgrade - from experience the more clarity with this kind of change
> the better so
> as not to unnecessarily raise alarm bells.
Ah, you are right. I thought I had "deprecated" in the text, but I now
see I did not, and we do have cases where we mention the deprecated
status in previous release notes, so the new text is:
Remove long-deprecated exclusive backup mode (David Steele, Nathan
Bossart)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2022-05-12 02:50:37 | Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-05-12 02:44:33 | Re: gitmaster access |