Re: Postgres perl module namespace

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres perl module namespace
Date: 2022-04-21 04:11:49
Message-ID: YmDZhcbSZaWUnDPo@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:56:17PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Basically I propose just to remove any mention of the Testlib items and
> get_free_port from the export and alias lists for versions where they
> are absent. If backpatchers need a function they can backport it if
> necessary.

Agreed. I am fine to stick to that (I may have done that only once or
twice in the past years, so that does not happen a lot either IMO).
The patch in itself looks like an improvement in the right direction,
so +1 from me.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2022-04-21 04:25:11 Re: Fix NULL pointer reference in _outPathTarget()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-04-21 04:07:18 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support