| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init |
| Date: | 2022-04-10 23:34:09 |
| Message-ID: | YlNpcXUN9kJ+x0vn@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 09:24:42PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Yeah I would prefer this approach too, although it couldn't prevent extension
> from directly modifying the underlying variables so I don't know how effective
> it would be.
>
> On the bright side, I see that citus is using SetConfigOption() to increase
> max_prepared_transactions [1]. That's the only extension mentioned in that
> thread that does modify some GUC, and this GUC was already marked as
> PGDLLIMPORT since 2017 so it probably wasn't done that way for Windows
> compatibility reason.
>
> In the meantime, should we add an open item?
Yes, I think that we need to discuss more the matter here, so added one.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2022-04-11 00:25:33 | Re: A qsort template |
| Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2022-04-10 23:07:46 | Re: Improving btree performance through specializing by key shape, take 2 |