| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? |
| Date: | 2022-04-09 15:58:24 |
| Message-ID: | YlGtICTMIJ886Ij3@jrouhaud |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:31:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> writes:
>
> > I would think that if \dconfig showed the non-default settings only,
> > it would be much more useful; the full list would still be available
> > with "\dconfig *". This is in line with \dt only showing tables on the
> > search_path, and "\dt *.*" showing all.
>
> Hm, I could get on board with that -- any other opinions?
+1 for it, that's often what I'm interested in when looking at the GUCs in
general.
> (Perhaps there's an argument for omitting "override"
> settings as well?)
-0.1. Most are usually not useful, but I can see at least data_checksums and
wal_buffers that are still interesting.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2022-04-09 16:14:20 | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-04-09 15:21:02 | Re: Add parameter jit_warn_above_fraction |