Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date: 2022-04-01 04:00:20
Message-ID: YkZ41Kx16/jiScQT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 08:42:41PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> The failure looked like this:
>
> # Running: diff -q /export/home/nm/farm/studio64v12_6/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/tmp_test_lPFv/dump1.sql /export/home/nm/farm/studio64v12_6/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/tmp_test_lPFv/dump2.sql
> /usr/bin/diff: illegal option -- q
> usage: diff [-bitw] [-c | -e | -f | -h | -n | -u] file1 file2
> diff [-bitw] [-C number | -U number] file1 file2
> diff [-bitw] [-D string] file1 file2
> diff [-bitw] [-c | -e | -f | -h | -n | -u] [-l] [-r] [-s] [-S name] directory1 directory2
> not ok 4 - old and new dump match after pg_upgrade

Ah, thanks for the information! So the problem was that the first
commit of the patch took the diff command from the MSVC scripts, and
there is no -q on Solaris 11.3. Using File::Compare should be enough
to fix the problem, then. Hopefully.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2022-04-01 04:08:00 Re: should vacuum's first heap pass be read-only?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-04-01 03:54:32 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set