From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
Date: | 2022-03-24 12:10:29 |
Message-ID: | YjxftT97R2Ld6Xdw@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:25:48PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> My solution for the docs is perhaps too confusing for the end-user,
> and we are talking about a Linux-only thing here anyway. So, at the
> end, I am tempted to just add the "2> /dev/null" as suggested upthread
> by Nathan and call it a day.
This still sounds like the best way to go for now, so done this way as
of bbd4951.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2022-03-24 13:07:26 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
Previous Message | Dirk Krautschick | 2022-03-24 08:39:36 | Vacuum behaviour for replicated nodes with pglogical (postgres 10) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2022-03-24 12:12:24 | Re: pg_stat_reset_single_*_counters vs pg_stat_database.stats_reset |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-03-24 12:09:26 | Re: turn fastgetattr and heap_getattr to inline functions |