From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces |
Date: | 2022-03-16 06:42:52 |
Message-ID: | YjGG7KypP4ZY1pnG@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:34:15AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> +1. Desn't the doc need to mention that?
Yes, I agree that it makes sense to add a note, even if
allow_in_place_tablespaces is a developer option. I have added the
following paragraph in the docs:
+ A full path of the symbolic link in <filename>pg_tblspc/</filename>
+ is returned. A relative path to the data directory is returned
+ for tablespaces created with
+ <xref linkend="guc-allow-in-place-tablespaces"/> enabled.
Another thing that was annoying in the first version of the patch is
the useless call to lstat() on Windows, not needed because it is
possible to rely just on pgwin32_is_junction() to check if readlink()
should be called or not.
This leads me to the revised version attached. What do you think?
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
tbspace-inplace-location-v2.patch | text/x-diff | 4.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-03-16 06:56:02 | Re: [PATCH] Accept IP addresses in server certificate SANs |
Previous Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2022-03-16 06:36:52 | RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |