From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces |
Date: | 2022-03-07 11:36:20 |
Message-ID: | YiXuNLQ65pRaSgfN@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:44:22PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The use may be limited to any automated testing and
> allow_in_place_tablespaces is a developer GUC, still it seems to me
> that there is an argument to allow the case rather than tweak any
> tests to hardcode a path with the tablespace OID. And any other code
> paths are able to handle such tablespaces, be they in recovery or in
> tablespace create/drop.
>
> A junction point is a directory on WIN32 as far as I recall, but
> pgreadlink() is here to ensure that we get the correct path on
> a source found as pgwin32_is_junction(), so we can rely on that. This
> stuff has led me to the attached.
Thomas, I'd rather fix this for the sake of the tests. One point is
that the function returns a relative path for in-place tablespaces,
but it would be easy enough to append a DataDir. What do you think?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2022-03-07 11:56:52 | Re: Add parameter jit_warn_above_fraction |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2022-03-07 11:30:56 | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |