Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, samay sharma <smilingsamay(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks
Date: 2022-03-02 16:00:50
Message-ID: Yh+UsiDYLGTYNOBL@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 10:54:27AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> It's our decision what we want to support and maintain in the code base
> and what we don't. Folks often ask for things that we don't or won't
> support and this isn't any different from that. We also remove things
> on a rather regular basis even when they're being used- generally
> because we have something better, as we do here. I disagree that an
> argument of 'some people use it so we can't remove it' holds any weight
> here.

I disagree.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-03-02 16:09:27 Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2022-03-02 15:54:27 Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks