Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc
Date: 2022-02-12 17:40:06
Message-ID: Ygfw9gX2tNlQFny9@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Re: Tom Lane
> Ah. That seems a bit problematic anyway ... if the version-dependent
> pg_configs don't all return identical results, what's the
> non-version-dependent one supposed to do?

It still returns a correct --includedir for client apps that need it.

(Unfortunately many need --includedir-server since that's where the
type OIDs live.)

Christoph

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-02-12 18:23:35 pgsql: Fix thinko in PQisBusy().
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-02-12 16:50:00 Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2022-02-12 19:58:53 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-02-12 17:25:03 Re: Re: PGroonga index-only scan problem with yesterday’s PostgreSQL updates