| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init |
| Date: | 2022-01-28 04:22:25 |
| Message-ID: | YfNvgVGRUYaFz7g4@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:18:15AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 09:56:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hmm. I have been looking at this patch, and the lack of centralized
>> solution that could be used for other GUCs worries me like Fujii-san,
>> even if this would prevent an incorrect use of MaxBackends in contexts
>> where it should not be used because it is not initialized yet. I
>> don't think it is a good idea in the long-term to apply this as-is.
>
> Alright. I think the comment adjustments still apply, so I split those out
> to a new patch.
No objections to this part from here, though I have not checked if
there are other areas that may require such an adjustment.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-01-28 04:36:21 | Re: GUC flags |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-01-28 03:28:17 | Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint? |