Re: Conventions

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 07:15:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > There is an implied "anything else not noted here should be taken as
> > literal token to type, or a variable, as context dictates" [1] - and since
> > () isn't mentioned...
> > I'd probably rather make that implied part explicit and avoid mentioning
> > parentheses explicitly.
>
> +1. I mean, if we have to say this for parentheses, what about
> commas, dashes, etc?
>
> > I would suggest moving the Tcl parenthetical to its own sentence. The
> > percentage of readers who will notice or care about Tcl synopses is
> > probably close to zero, and they are likely to be familiar enough to not
> > need our preface to enlighten them.
>
> Maybe time to drop the Tcl reference altogether? I like that language,
> but I fear it's next door to dead, so it certainly doesn't need to be
> mentioned outside the pltcl docs.

How is this patch?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.