Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2022-01-26 01:29:29
Message-ID: YfCj+QFS6hKlcscJ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:52:12PM +0530, tushar wrote:
> C) -R option is silently ignoring
>
> go to /tmp/pp folder and extract it - there is no "standby.signal" file and
> if we start cluster against this data directory,it will not be in slave
> mode.

Yeah, I don't think it's good to silently ignore the option, and we
should not generate the file on the server-side. Rather than erroring
in this case, you'd better add the file to the existing compressed
file of the base data folder on the client-side.

This makes me wonder whether we should begin tracking any open items
for v15.. We don't want to lose track of any issue with features
committed already in the tree.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-01-26 01:42:36 RE: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-26 01:23:46 Re: refactoring basebackup.c