Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Date: 2022-01-19 22:26:32
Message-ID: YeiQGMs7++mkZELC@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:11:48PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> I personally think VACUUM FOR WRAPAROUND is the best of the options
> provided thus far.

Could you avoid introducing a new grammar pattern in VACUUM? Any new
option had better be within the parenthesized part as it is extensible
at will with its set of DefElems.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-01-19 22:26:39 Re: missing indexes in indexlist with partitioned tables
Previous Message Zhihong Yu 2022-01-19 22:13:34 Re: missing indexes in indexlist with partitioned tables