Re: COMMENT ON lock

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "nikolai(dot)berkoff" <nikolai(dot)berkoff(at)pm(dot)me>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON lock
Date: 2022-01-19 04:45:07
Message-ID: YeeXUwWDDIklu9D+@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 03:37:35PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 14:11 +0000, nikolai.berkoff wrote:
>> I wanted to know what lock the COMMENT ON command took and I had to look in the
>> source code, makes sense to me that it should be documented.  I've also added
>> it to the list of commands that take a SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock.
>
> +1.

No objections to add more details for all that. Will fix.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-01-19 09:24:57 Re: gettext instructions for Windows seems wrong
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-01-18 23:28:29 Re: Typo in "27.2.8. Synchronous Replication"