From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Refactoring of compression options in pg_basebackup |
Date: | 2022-01-19 04:27:28 |
Message-ID: | YeeTMHzZILvX6MaI@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:04:56AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think it could make sense for you implement
> --compress=METHOD[:LEVEL], keeping -z and -Z N as synonyms for
> --compress=gzip and --compress=gzip:N, and with --compress=N being
> interpreted as --compress=gzip:N. Then I'll generalize that to
> --compress=[{client|server}-]METHOD[:LEVEL] on the other thread. I
> think we should leave it where, if you don't say either client or
> server, you get client, because that's the historical behavior.
>
> If that doesn't work for you, please let me know what you would prefer.
WFM. Attached is a patch that extends --compress to handle a method
with an optional compression level. Some extra tests are added to
cover all that.
Thoughts?
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-Rework-the-option-set-of-pg_basebackup.patch | text/x-diff | 12.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2022-01-19 04:31:59 | Re: [PATCH] reduce page overlap of GiST indexes built using sorted method |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-01-19 04:16:46 | Re: Adding CI to our tree |