Re: libpq compression (part 2)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Daniil Zakhlystov <usernamedt(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq compression (part 2)
Date: 2022-01-07 21:09:37
Message-ID: YdisEaJaBENLmOti@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 03:56:39PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> As for the details of how we allow control over it, I suppose there's a
> number of options. Having it in the HBA doesn't seem terrible, though I
> suspect most will just want to enable it across the board and having to
> have "compression=allowed" or whatever added to every hba line seems
> likely to be annoying. Maybe a global GUC and then allow the hba to
> override?

Ewe, I would like to avoid going in the GUC & pg_hba.conf direction,
unless we have other cases where we already do this.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-01-07 21:12:43 Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2022-01-07 20:56:39 Re: libpq compression (part 2)