Re: biblio.sgml dead link

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: biblio.sgml dead link
Date: 2022-01-05 01:26:54
Message-ID: YdTz3rV0v+O8KMrT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:10:07PM +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> The replacement is a ~200 euro pdf (2021). I'd be thankful if someone would
> send the pdf to me; maybe I can update my JSON tests.
>
> And we should remove that entry from the bibliography (or have it point to
> the new page [1]).

Removing the entry seems a bit overdoing it to me, and updating to a
paywall does not sound completely right to me either. Another thing
that we could do is to just remove the link, but keep its reference.

Any thoughts from others?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-05 01:30:46 Re: Delay the variable initialization in get_rel_sync_entry
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-01-05 00:05:08 Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation