Re: Report checkpoint progress in server logs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report checkpoint progress in server logs
Date: 2022-01-04 12:11:29
Message-ID: YdQ5ccbuOezfIWMC@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:40:59AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I think the right choice to solve the *general* problem is the
>> mentioned pg_stat_progress_checkpoints.
>
> +1

Agreed. I don't see why this would not work as there are
PgBackendStatus entries for each auxiliary process.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-04 12:20:26 Re: [PATCH] allow src/tools/msvc/*.bat files to be called from the root of the source tree
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-04 12:01:34 Re: pg_dump/restore --no-tableam