Re: pg_dump/restore --no-tableam

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: pg_dump/restore --no-tableam
Date: 2022-01-11 07:50:23
Message-ID: Yd02v3QnISIUZAuW@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:44:24PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> + <varlistentry>
> + <varlistentry>
> + <term><option>--no-table-am</option></term>
> + <listitem>
> + <para>
> + Do not output commands to select table access methods.
> + With this option, all objects will be created with whichever
> + table access method is the default during restore.
> + </para>

Hmm. --no-table-am may not be the best choice. Should this be called
--no-table-access-method instead?

> - no_toast_compression => {
> - dump_cmd => [
> - 'pg_dump', '--no-sync',
> - "--file=$tempdir/no_toast_compression.sql",
> - '--no-toast-compression', 'postgres',
> - ],
> - },

Why is this command moved down?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey Shinderuk 2022-01-11 07:50:50 Re: Improve error handling of HMAC computations and SCRAM
Previous Message Sushant Postgres 2022-01-11 07:49:10 Re: [Ext:] Re: Stream Replication not working