Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index
Date: 2021-12-15 22:39:52
Message-ID: YbpuuHqAkf2hjOA0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:18:26AM +0000, wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> Yeah, if we can add some details to pg-doc and code comments, I think it will
> be more friendly to PG users and developers.

Would you like to write a patch to address all that?
Thanks,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-12-15 22:50:41 Re: Life cycles of tuple descriptors
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-12-15 22:38:52 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)