| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: add recovery, backup, archive, streaming etc. activity messages to server logs along with ps display |
| Date: | 2021-12-08 04:35:48 |
| Message-ID: | YbA2JDvNomauqPV+@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 06:28:24PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Upon thinking further, having at least the messages at LOG level [1]
> would be helpful to know what's happening with the system while in
> recovery. Although these messages at LOG level seem to be filling up
> the server logs, having a good log consumption and rotation mechanism
> (I'm sure every major postgres vendor would have one) would be
> sufficient to allay that concern.
+ ereport(LOG,
+ (errmsg("recovering WAL segment \"%s\" from source \"%s\"",
+ xlogfname, srcname)));
Isn't this approach an issue for translations? It seems to me that
terms like "stream" or "archive" had better be translated properly,
meaning that this needs a fully-constructed sentence.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-12-08 04:37:57 | Re: parallel vacuum comments |
| Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-12-08 04:19:02 | Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint? |