Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))"

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))"
Date: 2021-10-11 00:45:26
Message-ID: YWOJJuUj7Qxz4y+y@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:49:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Looks right. I would be tempted to keep the one in readfuncs.c
> though, mostly as a matter of style.

I have left this one alone, and applied the rest as of 68f7c4b.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-11 00:50:54 Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-11 00:40:53 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set