On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:18:47PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 10/5/21 4:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> My problem with that is that that means there's no convenient way to discover
>> what one needs to do to run all tests. Perhaps we could have one all-taptest
>> target or such?
>>
>
> Yeah. That's a much better proposal.
+1. It is so easy to forget one or more targets when running this
script.
--
Michael