Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
Date: 2021-10-01 06:22:11
Message-ID: YVapE9jLaItjwzqV@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:08:17PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's certainly less of an issue than it used to be back in my day.
>
> Any thoughts on the patch I attached?

I don't know. Anyway, this is actively worked on, so I have taken the
liberty to move that to the next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-01 06:27:23 Re: pgbench bug candidate: negative "initial connection time"
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-01 06:19:50 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set