Re: Timeout failure in 019_replslot_limit.pl

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timeout failure in 019_replslot_limit.pl
Date: 2021-09-20 13:18:15
Message-ID: YUiKF37JD4MjnYLT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 09:38:29AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Sep-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> If that doesn't work, let's try Horiguchi-san's idea of using some
>>> `ps` flags to find the process.
>>
>> Tried this one as well, to see the same failure.
>
> Hmm, do you mean that you used Horiguchi-san's patch in [1] and the
> failure still occurred?
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/20210907.120106.1483239898065111540.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com

Yes, that's what I mean.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-09-20 14:03:05 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-09-20 13:06:17 psql: tab completion differs on semicolon placement